Schimmel & Parks, APLC - Litigation
Tell Us About Your Case 818-922-8544

Lawsuit: Volkswagen engaging in companywide age discrimination

A 60-year-old former supervisor at a Volkswagen manufacturing facility in Tennessee has filed a collective-action against the automaker. The federal lawsuit claims that Volkswagen AG and two of its U.S. subsidiaries “are engaged in a company-wide policy of age discrimination against employees 50 years and older.” The plaintiff is suing on behalf of himself and other affected employees nationwide.

Volkswagen seeks a ‘younger’ image after Dieselgate

The issue arose in the wake of Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” scandal, according to the plaintiff’s attorney. The scandal involved allegations that the company intentionally cheated U.S. emissions tests on diesel vehicles by programming them to detect when they were being tested and produce inaccurately positive test results.

Dieselgate was devastating to Volkswagen’s worldwide reputation. In November 2016, in an apparent effort to repair its reputation or at least to distract from the scandal, the company announced a rebranding campaign called “TRANSFORM 2025+.”

In June 2017, Volkswagen AG issued a press release announcing that “We are expecting our management levels to become younger and slimmer." It went on to say, “We are becoming slimmer, leaner and younger. This will make Volkswagen faster and more efficient at the same time as providing new motivation for junior managers.”

At the same time, it announced its “Pact for the Future” initiative which, as part of TRANSFORM 2025+, would eliminate 30,000 jobs globally. According to the plaintiff’s attorney, the policy is actually to swap out older VW workers with much younger ones. He contends that the company plan to shed approximately 7,000 jobs in North and South America through an early retirement scheme it referred to as “natural fluctuations.”

Most of the jobs on the chopping block seem to be held by workers 50 and older. In fact, three days after issuing the “Pact for the Future” press release, the plaintiff was demoted and transferred to a position in another department. He was told that his demotion “was in recognition of his hard work.”

He was given a year to find a new position in the company or his demotion would become permanent. Since then, the plaintiff has applied for a number of other positions in the company but, he claims, “VW management has prevented him from securing them.”

Injunction sought to prevent further age discrimination

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects U.S. employees aged 40 and older from age-based discrimination in hiring, promotion, job assignments, discharge, compensation, or any other aspect of the job or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. It is also illegal to harass employees because of their ages and to retaliate against employees who stand up for their rights under the ADEA.

Is it illegal to swap out older workers for younger ones in pursuit of a “younger image”? While the case is still before the courts, the desire for a particular image has been found to be no excuse for discrimination in other employment law cases. Volkswagen’s professed intention to create a “younger” image is strong evidence of an intention to discriminate against people over 40.

The plaintiff, according to his attorney, “is a talented American auto worker who simply wants to continue performing the work at VW he is most capable of doing at a salary commensurate with his considerable training, skills, and experience.”

He is seeking an injunction on behalf of himself and similarly situated workers that would restore him to his former title and responsibilities and prevent Volkswagen from discriminating against any other workers over 50.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Insurance
    Bad Faith Result

    $250 Million

    Recovery for policyholders victimized by insurance bad faith practices following Northridge Earthquake.

  • Recent Class
    Action Result

    $23 Million

    Judgment on behalf of a class of employees for personal injury and loss of property related to illegal working conditions.

  • Recent Insurance
    Bad Faith Result

    $4 Million

    Recovery in defense costs for insureds denied their right to independent counsel by their insurance companies.

More Case Results

"I just wanted to say thank you again for taking our case through trial. We just think you are the best." - John S.

Read More Testimonials
super lawyers | Alan I Schimmel super lawyers | Michael Parks AV preeminent Martindale-Hubbell Lawyer Ratings LACBA los angeles county bar association The state bar of california Consumer Attorneys Association of los angeles CAALA

Legal Support When You Most Need It

To learn more, or to speak with a lawyer, reach out to our firm today. You can call us at 818-922-8544 or reach us online. We're here to answer your questions and address your concerns.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

email us for a response
Based in Sherman Oaks, we serve throughout the region.

Schimmel & Parks, APLC
15303 Ventura Blvd
Suite 650
Comerica Building
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

Phone: 818-922-8544
Fax: 818-464-5091
Sherman Oaks Law Office Map

Contact This Office